Splunk On-Call vs. Checkly
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Splunk On-Call | Checkly |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Review count | 52 | 33 |
| Ease of use | 8.8 | 9.1 |
| Ease of setup | 9.1 | 9.3 |
| Quality of support | 9.2 | 9.5 |
| Meets requirements | 9.0 | 9.1 |
| NPS | 67.307692 | 72.727273 |
| Small Business | 19.2% | 63.6% |
| Mid-Market | 46.2% | 21.2% |
| Enterprise | 34.6% | 15.2% |
| Total page views | 223 | 264 |
| Total LLM citations | 1,252 | 5,234 |
Splunk On-Call
Splunk On-Call makes on-call management less frustrating while reducing mean time to acknowledge and resolve incidents. Splunk On-Call empowers DevOps teams by delivering alerts to the right people so they can collaborate and solve problems. Teams receive context-rich notifications and collaborate cross-functionally to empower fast, efficient incident resolution with reduced downtime. Stakeholders can gain visibility to critical incidents and steps taken to resolve them.
- Alerting System
- Alert Management
- Incident Management
- Flexibility
- Customization
- Integrations
Checkly
Checkly allows engineers to write their E2E monitors as they write their cloud-native application, as code. Powered by the Checkly CLI, engineers code, test, and deploy API and Playwright-based checks from their code repository. Checkly's programmable Monitoring as Code (MaC) workflow seamlessly integrates with modern development practices, tools, and frameworks, at a fraction of the cost of legacy testing and monitoring solutions. The end result?
- Easy Integrations
- Monitoring
- Integrations
- Monitoring Services
- Alerting System
- Ease of Use