G2 Vendor Directory

SoftNAS Cloud NAS vs. Kilter

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricSoftNAS Cloud NAS

by SoftNAS

Kilter

by BackBox

Overall rating4.24.5
Review count11202
Ease of use8.49.4
Ease of setup8.69.0
Quality of support8.29.5
Meets requirements8.89.5
NPS45.45454577
Small Business18.2%32.7%
Mid-Market54.5%28.1%
Enterprise27.3%39.3%
Total page views13653
Total LLM citations00

SoftNAS Cloud NAS

SoftNAS is a Linux-based virtual NAS appliance deployed on public and private cloud services like Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure, and VMware vSphere. SoftNAS can also run on RHEL if customers prefer it over CentOS. It runs as a virtual machine, providing a broad range of software-defined capabilities, including data performance, cost management, availability, control, and security. SoftNAS provides unified storage designed and optimized for high-performance, higher than normal I/O per second (IOPS), and data reliability and recoverability.

Pros

  • Cost Efficiency
  • Time-saving
  • Ease of Use
  • Useful

Kilter

More than 500 enterprises worldwide trust Kilter by BackBox as their network cyber resilience platform. Kilter includes support for network devices from over 180 vendors, thousands of pre-built automations, and a no-code way to create new ones. Kilter empowers teams with the confidence to automate critical network processes, maintain business continuity during disruptions, and recover swiftly. From backups and OS updates to configuration compliance and vulnerability management, Kilter ensures that automations deliver consistent, reliable outcomes.

Pros

  • Automation
  • Ease of Use
  • Backup
  • Time-saving
  • Features
  • Backup Management