Equip vs. Filtered
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Equip | Filtered |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.8 | 4.9 |
| Review count | 975 | 16 |
| Ease of use | 9.5 | 9.2 |
| Ease of setup | 9.3 | 10.0 |
| Quality of support | 9.4 | 10.0 |
| Meets requirements | 9.3 | 9.6 |
| NPS | 85.817308 | 93.75 |
| Small Business | 78.9% | 33.3% |
| Mid-Market | 15.3% | 40.0% |
| Enterprise | 5.9% | 26.7% |
| Total page views | 494 | 28 |
| Total LLM citations | 1,583 | 38 |
Equip
Equip helps recruiters screen candidates across skills with its automated talent assessments. It helps hiring teams focus on the best-performing candidates pool by shortlisting them via Ready-To-Use AI-proctored assessments. You no longer need to read multiple CVs or call each candidate. With Equip you can: 1. Create Assessments with our Question Banks: Role-specific assessments in seconds, with thousands of ready-to-use questions that test skills at different levels 2.
- Ease of Use
- Time-saving
- Efficiency
- Navigation Ease
- Candidate Management
- Ease of Access
Filtered
Filtered’s modern approach to hiring technical talent increases your efficiency and effectiveness. With Filtered, companies can automate and streamline the hiring process with customized and automatically-graded job simulations so that only qualified candidates are advanced to interview rounds. The end result is a process that yields better candidates for hiring managers and gives applicants clearer insight into the actual tech stack they’ll be working with on a daily basis.