G2 Vendor Directory

RAM Structural System vs. Assemble

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricRAM Structural System

by Bentley Systems

Assemble

by Autodesk

Overall rating4.04.3
Review count1388
Ease of use8.48.6
Ease of setup8.68.4
Quality of support8.78.5
Meets requirements9.18.5
NPS38.46153849.411765
Small Business84.6%3.4%
Mid-Market7.7%41.4%
Enterprise7.7%55.2%
Total page views314141
Total LLM citations428373

RAM Structural System

Save time and money by automating the most tedious, repetitive, and time-consuming project tasks. When you increase your productivity, you can focus on the more critical aspects of design and provide a superior and more cost-effective solution to your client. RAM Structural System provides you a complete solution for analysis, design, drafting, and documentation for steel and concrete buildings, foundations, and even individual structural components; all in compliance with your local building codes.

Pros

  • Customer Support
  • Ease of Use
  • Features
  • Collaboration

Assemble

Assemble Systems provides a SaaS solution that enables construction professionals to condition, query and connect BIM data to key workflows including design reviews, takeoffs, estimating, change management, value engineering and schedule management. Instant Access to BIM: Provide the entire project team with access to the model and drawings in the cloud to quickly group, sort, and filter quantities and associated meta-data Instant Access to Quantities: Instant access to complete project inventory to easily organize project data by user defined parameters such as bid-package, locations,

Pros

  • Features
  • Model Coordination