RAM Structural System
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Building Design and Building Information Modeling (BIM)
Pros and cons
Pros
- Customer Support
- Ease of Use
- Features
- Collaboration
Cons
- Software Instability
- Inefficiency
- Missing Features
- Update Issues
- Difficult Navigation
- Poor Interface Design
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 84.6% |
| Mid-Market | 7.7% |
| Enterprise | 7.7% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q1 | 1 | 4.5 |
| 2025 Q4 | 2 | 4.3 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Puissance et Spécialisation Exceptionnelles pour l’Analyse Structurelle
“J'aime sa puissance et sa spécialisation dans l'analyse structurelle des bâtiments complexe, et surtout y compris els charges sismiques.”
Very good for gravity design. Very capable for Lateral but not as user-friendly.
“RAM saves a lot of time distributing loads to the various members in a building. I also like its built in wind load generation and seismic code checks in the RAM FRAME module. I also appreciate all the recent video tutorials they've added on YouTube and on their training platform”
Well-rounded structural Analysis Tool
“RAM structural system offers wide varity of tools to assist the engineer in analysing different types of structures of different materials. The UI is easy to use and straightforward.”