G2 Vendor Directory

Qrator vs. Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricQrator

by Qrator Labs

Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)

by Thales Group

Overall rating4.64.7
Review count1341
Ease of use9.19.4
Ease of setup9.39.2
Quality of support9.39.1
Meets requirements9.39.6
NPS69.23076987.179487
Small Business38.5%39.0%
Mid-Market38.5%19.5%
Enterprise23.1%41.5%
Total page views96464
Total LLM citations5394,607

Qrator

Qrator Labs is an acknowledged expert in Continuous Network Availability offering various Network security solutions to ensure safe Internet and continuous DDoS mitigation for businesses worldwide. Qrator Labs unique anycast architecture provides a reliable geo-distributed, low latency web app protection platform across the globe (North and South America, Europe, Middle East and Asia) with filtering bandwidth capacity more than 4 Tbps and 15 points of presence worldwide. Traffic filtering is the core specialisation of the company.

Pros

    Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)

    As organizations increasingly rely on web applications to drive business, ensuring those applications are protected from cyber threats is essential. Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) delivers robust, enterprise-class protection for applications and APIs across cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments. With near-zero false positives and managed rules created and tested by Imperva Threat Research, more than 90% of customers deploy in blocking mode from day one.

    Pros

    • Protection
    • Cybersecurity
    • WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    • Security
    • Real-time Monitoring
    • Customer Support