Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
41
Reviews
4.7
Star rating
#11
Rank in DDoS Protection
Pros and cons
Pros
- Protection
- Cybersecurity
- WAF (Web Application Firewall)
- Security
- Real-time Monitoring
- Customer Support
Cons
- User Interface Issues
- Complex Configuration
- Ineffective Blocking
- Complex Setup
- Expensive
- Limited Customization
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
—
87
Enterprise
3
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 39.0% |
| Mid-Market | 19.5% |
| Enterprise | 41.5% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q3 | 1 | 3.5 |
Satisfaction ratings
Ease of Use9.4
Ease of Setup9.2
Quality of Support9.1
Meets Requirements9.6
What reviewers say
Very well setup Infrastructure.
5.0
“Ease of use and setup. I used inperva for setting up my web application firewall for my websites. It was based on reverse proxy technique.”
Imperva Pros and cons
3.5
“its strong security features, advanced threat protection, and comprehensive coverage against web application attacks”
One of the best WAF vendor today
4.0
“It provides protection for all the platforms, like Active and legacy applications, third party applications, and also Cloud and container applications. I've already looked into other competitors such as F5 and SiteWall, but the Imperva firewall seems to be a bit better than those”