Qodo vs. Checkmarx
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Qodo | Checkmarx |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.5 | 4.2 |
| Review count | 123 | 50 |
| Ease of use | 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Ease of setup | 9.2 | 8.4 |
| Quality of support | 8.8 | 8.6 |
| Meets requirements | 9.0 | 8.8 |
| NPS | 65.289256 | 45.652174 |
| Small Business | 59.3% | 22.0% |
| Mid-Market | 25.2% | 22.0% |
| Enterprise | 15.4% | 56.0% |
| Total page views | 1,393 | 983 |
| Total LLM citations | 9,104 | 11,742 |
Qodo
Qodo is the AI Code Quality and Governance Platform that helps engineering teams maintain code quality as AI accelerates coding velocity. Qodo works across IDEs and Git platforms to catch bugs earlier, enforce standards automatically, and scale review to match faster coding output. Qodo combines deep codebase understanding with a self-learning rules system and multi-agent review to validate code logic, detect architectural drift, surface security issues, and enforce standards before merge.
- Ease of Use
- Time-saving
- Functionality
- Helpful
- Automation
- Speed
Checkmarx
Checkmarx exists so the world can innovate faster than it ever has and still trust what it builds. That purpose starts with closing the Risk Gap — the widening distance between how fast software gets created and how fast risk can be understood and removed. As AI compresses the software development lifecycle from months to minutes, the old model of shipping code with known vulnerabilities and racing to patch it before attackers strike no longer works. Checkmarx's foundation: decades of deterministic threat intelligence and trillions of lines of code scanned each year.
- Implementation Ease
- User Interface
- Customer Support
- Ease of Use
- Dashboard Usability
- Automation Testing