Progress Chef vs. Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Progress Chef | Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Review count | 136 | 378 |
| Ease of use | 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Ease of setup | 7.9 | 8.5 |
| Quality of support | 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Meets requirements | 9.0 | 9.1 |
| NPS | 51.879699 | 70.540541 |
| Small Business | 22.8% | 16.4% |
| Mid-Market | 38.2% | 35.2% |
| Enterprise | 39.0% | 48.4% |
| Total page views | 684 | 1,139 |
| Total LLM citations | 604 | 9,437 |
Progress Chef
The Progress Chef portfolio consists of multiple, integrated products. It offers a set of capabilities that provide organizations the flexibility to support different use cases. All these capabilities are based on a trusted set of tools rooted in open source, starting with the ability to configure, deploy and manage all aspects of a technology stack as well as the ability to secure and support compliance across the asset fleet.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
Red Hat® Ansible® Automation Platform is Red Hat's primary enterprise automation product offering., it includes all of the tooling needed for building, deploying, and managing end-to-end automation at scale. Ansible Automation Platform makes it possible for users across an organization to share, vet, and manage automation content by means of a simple, powerful, and agentless technical implementation. IT managers can provide guidelines on how automation is applied to individual teams.
- Automation
- Automation Efficiency
- Ease of Use
- Easy Integrations
- Task Automation
- Ansible Playbooks