Pliant vs. Kilter
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Pliant | Kilter |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Review count | 20 | 202 |
| Ease of use | 9.4 | 9.4 |
| Ease of setup | 9.1 | 9.0 |
| Quality of support | 9.5 | 9.5 |
| Meets requirements | 9.3 | 9.5 |
| NPS | 80 | 77 |
| Small Business | 30.0% | 32.7% |
| Mid-Market | 45.0% | 28.1% |
| Enterprise | 25.0% | 39.3% |
| Total page views | 41 | 653 |
| Total LLM citations | 161 | 0 |
Pliant
Headquartered in Boston, Pliant provides an advanced API-driven IT orchestration platform that automates, integrates and connects the digital enterprise. Pliant’s solutions simplify and streamline how operations and engineering teams build, deploy, and orchestrate their environments. Using a low-code approach and transforming API code into deployment-ready action blocks, Pliant facilitates, integrates, and secures communication up and down the technology stack between platforms, services, and applications. For more information on the company and its solutions, go to www.pliant.io.
- Speed
- Efficiency
- Ease of Use
- User Interface
Kilter
More than 500 enterprises worldwide trust Kilter by BackBox as their network cyber resilience platform. Kilter includes support for network devices from over 180 vendors, thousands of pre-built automations, and a no-code way to create new ones. Kilter empowers teams with the confidence to automate critical network processes, maintain business continuity during disruptions, and recover swiftly. From backups and OS updates to configuration compliance and vulnerability management, Kilter ensures that automations deliver consistent, reliable outcomes.
- Automation
- Ease of Use
- Backup
- Time-saving
- Features
- Backup Management