G2 Vendor Directory

OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. ZeroPath

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricOpenText Static Application Security Testing

by OpenText

ZeroPath

by ZeroPath

Overall rating4.54.5
Review count2411
Ease of use8.98.7
Ease of setup8.69.1
Quality of support8.99.5
Meets requirements8.68.9
NPS61.90476263.636364
Small Business29.2%50.0%
Mid-Market25.0%37.5%
Enterprise45.8%12.5%
Total page views369163
Total LLM citations1,393260

OpenText Static Application Security Testing

OpenText™ Static Application Security Testing (SAST) is a comprehensive solution designed to identify and remediate security vulnerabilities within an application's source code during the early stages of development. By analyzing code from the "inside out," SAST provides immediate feedback to developers, enabling them to address security issues promptly and effectively. Key Features and Functionality: - Extensive Language Support: Supports over 33 programming languages and more than 1,400 vulnerability categories, ensuring broad applicability across various development environments.

Pros

  • Integration Support
  • Integrations
  • Easy Integrations

ZeroPath

ZeroPath (YC S24) is the first AI-native application security platform that fundamentally reimagines how organizations find and fix vulnerabilities. Unlike deterministic SAST tools that bolt AI onto legacy rule engines, ZeroPath was built from the ground up to combine large language models with advanced program analysis (AST, data flow, taint tracking) by Ex-Tesla Red Team and Google Security engineers. ZeroPath's core differentiation is detecting critical vulnerabilities that pattern-matching SAST fundamentally cannot find.

Pros

  • Accuracy of Findings
  • Security
  • Accuracy
  • Vulnerability Detection
  • Vulnerability Identification
  • Ease of Use