G2 Vendor Directory

OpenText Static Application Security Testing

by OpenText

24

Reviews

4.5

Star rating

#10

Rank in Static Code Analysis

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Integration Support
  • Integrations
  • Easy Integrations

Cons

  • False Positives

Traffic & LLM citations

Monthly G2.com page views and citations by AI answer engines for OpenText Static Application Security Testing.

Page views and citations · OpenText Static Application Security Testing

Source: G2 review data

Key stats

—

62

Enterprise

2

Adoption by company size

SegmentShare of reviews
Small Business29.2%
Mid-Market25.0%
Enterprise45.8%

Quarterly history

QuarterReviewsStar rating
2025 Q114.0

Satisfaction ratings

Ease of Use8.9
Ease of Setup8.6
Quality of Support8.9
Meets Requirements8.6

What reviewers say

Fortify Static Code Analyzer (SCA)

4.0

“Fortify SCA is having large Technologies Stack support, It supports more then 34+ Languages for Static Analysis. And also he is having huge integration capabalities with other third party tools.”

Sr. Security Engineer

Experienced Security Test Engineer in the cloud security, Supplychain security, health care.

5.0

“Ease of using, deployment in CI/CD & the custom ruleset/report creation.”

Security Engineer 2

Veteran & Powerful SCA tool

4.5

“Fortify has been the first choice for doing secure (static) code analysis for many years because 1. Languages support - it supports both legacy and modern development languages. 2. Deployment Model - on-prem, cloud, Security as a service (FOD) 3. Technical support - Fortify no”

Principal Consultant