OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. OverOps
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | OpenText Static Application Security Testing | OverOps |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.5 | 3.6 |
| Review count | 24 | 12 |
| Ease of use | 8.9 | 8.0 |
| Ease of setup | 8.6 | 7.1 |
| Quality of support | 8.9 | 8.0 |
| Meets requirements | 8.6 | 8.0 |
| NPS | 61.904762 | 8.333333 |
| Small Business | 29.2% | 66.7% |
| Mid-Market | 25.0% | 25.0% |
| Enterprise | 45.8% | 8.3% |
| Total page views | 369 | 50 |
| Total LLM citations | 1,393 | 25 |
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
OpenText™ Static Application Security Testing (SAST) is a comprehensive solution designed to identify and remediate security vulnerabilities within an application's source code during the early stages of development. By analyzing code from the "inside out," SAST provides immediate feedback to developers, enabling them to address security issues promptly and effectively. Key Features and Functionality: - Extensive Language Support: Supports over 33 programming languages and more than 1,400 vulnerability categories, ensuring broad applicability across various development environments.
- Integration Support
- Integrations
- Easy Integrations
OverOps
OverOps root cause analysis at runtime instantly pinpoints why critical issues break backend Java and .NET environments in pre-prod through production. Detective-work such as searching logs is not required to reproduce critical issues. OverOps delivers the precise line of code and associated variables. OverOps requires no code changes so engineering teams can develop fast without sacrificing quality.