G2 Vendor Directory

OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. CodeScan

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricOpenText Static Application Security Testing

by OpenText

CodeScan

by AutoRABIT

Overall rating4.54.6
Review count2434
Ease of use8.98.8
Ease of setup8.68.9
Quality of support8.99.1
Meets requirements8.68.7
NPS61.90476273.333333
Small Business29.2%17.6%
Mid-Market25.0%38.2%
Enterprise45.8%44.1%
Total page views369112
Total LLM citations1,393224

OpenText Static Application Security Testing

OpenText™ Static Application Security Testing (SAST) is a comprehensive solution designed to identify and remediate security vulnerabilities within an application's source code during the early stages of development. By analyzing code from the "inside out," SAST provides immediate feedback to developers, enabling them to address security issues promptly and effectively. Key Features and Functionality: - Extensive Language Support: Supports over 33 programming languages and more than 1,400 vulnerability categories, ensuring broad applicability across various development environments.

Pros

  • Integration Support
  • Integrations
  • Easy Integrations

CodeScan

CodeScan Shield addresses code quality, security, and compliance liabilities with two automated modules: CodeScan and OrgScan. CodeScan provides static code analysis for total visibility into code health from the moment it’s written through production. OrgScan governs organizational policies by enforcing the security and compliance rules mandated for your Salesforce environment. Together, they ensure the code that makes up your Salesforce environment and the way the environment is being utilized will always meet high standards.

Pros