OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. Codacy
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | OpenText Static Application Security Testing | Codacy |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Review count | 24 | 31 |
| Ease of use | 8.9 | 9.2 |
| Ease of setup | 8.6 | 9.2 |
| Quality of support | 8.9 | 9.1 |
| Meets requirements | 8.6 | 9.0 |
| NPS | 61.904762 | 77.419355 |
| Small Business | 29.2% | 56.7% |
| Mid-Market | 25.0% | 20.0% |
| Enterprise | 45.8% | 23.3% |
| Total page views | 369 | 435 |
| Total LLM citations | 1,393 | 6,320 |
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
OpenText™ Static Application Security Testing (SAST) is a comprehensive solution designed to identify and remediate security vulnerabilities within an application's source code during the early stages of development. By analyzing code from the "inside out," SAST provides immediate feedback to developers, enabling them to address security issues promptly and effectively. Key Features and Functionality: - Extensive Language Support: Supports over 33 programming languages and more than 1,400 vulnerability categories, ensuring broad applicability across various development environments.
- Integration Support
- Integrations
- Easy Integrations
Codacy
Codacy is the code quality and security platform for AI-assisted engineering teams. AI is now embedded through the engineering workflow, which has made teams faster, but also adds risk to everything they ship. Codacy helps AI-assisted teams ship high-quality, secure code across the full software development lifecycle, starting in the agent and editor, through pull requests in Git, and into containers and runtime security. At each stage we check for quality issues, security vulnerabilities and AI coding risk introduced into the codebase, and help devs and agent fix them effortlessly.
- Security
- Automation Testing
- Easy Integrations
- Code Quality
- Features
- Useful