OpenText Static Application Security Testing vs. Checkmarx
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | OpenText Static Application Security Testing | Checkmarx |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.5 | 4.2 |
| Review count | 24 | 50 |
| Ease of use | 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Ease of setup | 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Quality of support | 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Meets requirements | 8.6 | 8.8 |
| NPS | 61.904762 | 45.652174 |
| Small Business | 29.2% | 22.0% |
| Mid-Market | 25.0% | 22.0% |
| Enterprise | 45.8% | 56.0% |
| Total page views | 369 | 983 |
| Total LLM citations | 1,393 | 11,742 |
OpenText Static Application Security Testing
OpenText™ Static Application Security Testing (SAST) is a comprehensive solution designed to identify and remediate security vulnerabilities within an application's source code during the early stages of development. By analyzing code from the "inside out," SAST provides immediate feedback to developers, enabling them to address security issues promptly and effectively. Key Features and Functionality: - Extensive Language Support: Supports over 33 programming languages and more than 1,400 vulnerability categories, ensuring broad applicability across various development environments.
- Integration Support
- Integrations
- Easy Integrations
Checkmarx
Checkmarx exists so the world can innovate faster than it ever has and still trust what it builds. That purpose starts with closing the Risk Gap — the widening distance between how fast software gets created and how fast risk can be understood and removed. As AI compresses the software development lifecycle from months to minutes, the old model of shipping code with known vulnerabilities and racing to patch it before attackers strike no longer works. Checkmarx's foundation: decades of deterministic threat intelligence and trillions of lines of code scanned each year.
- Implementation Ease
- User Interface
- Customer Support
- Ease of Use
- Dashboard Usability
- Automation Testing