G2 Vendor Directory

NetApp Backup and Recovery vs. Kilter

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricNetApp Backup and Recovery

by NetApp

Kilter

by BackBox

Overall rating4.04.5
Review count33202
Ease of use8.39.4
Ease of setup8.39.0
Quality of support8.99.5
Meets requirements8.79.5
NPS36.66666777
Small Business3.0%32.7%
Mid-Market36.4%28.1%
Enterprise60.6%39.3%
Total page views218653
Total LLM citations1150

NetApp Backup and Recovery

The NetApp Console simplifies the implementation of any backup strategy, including the spectrum of 3-2-1 backup variants, without needing multiple resource managers or specialized personnel. Users can easily define local snapshots and replication schemes or back up to any object store in the cloud or on-premises using an intuitive interface. NetApp's block-level, incremental-forever technology preserves all storage efficiencies, significantly reducing the amount of data that’s replicated and stored.

Pros

    Kilter

    More than 500 enterprises worldwide trust Kilter by BackBox as their network cyber resilience platform. Kilter includes support for network devices from over 180 vendors, thousands of pre-built automations, and a no-code way to create new ones. Kilter empowers teams with the confidence to automate critical network processes, maintain business continuity during disruptions, and recover swiftly. From backups and OS updates to configuration compliance and vulnerability management, Kilter ensures that automations deliver consistent, reliable outcomes.

    Pros

    • Automation
    • Ease of Use
    • Backup
    • Time-saving
    • Features
    • Backup Management