Minerva vs. Epic
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Minerva | Epic |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 3.5 | 4.2 |
| Review count | 14 | 940 |
| Ease of use | 8.6 | 8.4 |
| Ease of setup | 8.3 | 7.6 |
| Quality of support | 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Meets requirements | 8.1 | 9.0 |
| NPS | 0 | 44.481605 |
| Small Business | 57.1% | 6.5% |
| Mid-Market | 21.4% | 16.2% |
| Enterprise | 21.4% | 77.2% |
| Total page views | 35 | 2,605 |
| Total LLM citations | 42 | 8,421 |
Minerva
MphRx’s Minerva is an enterprise-level SMART on FHIR digital healthcare platform, engineered to aggregate data from disparate IT systems to build a unified longitudinal patient health record. Minerva’s capabilities are configurable to deliver scalable digital transformation through dedicated cloud deployments. The platform is deployed in over 20 countries and manages over three-hundred million patient records. Minerva has enabled large health systems to aggregate healthcare data and orchestrate workflows across complex and diverse technology environments using a unique vendor-neutral approach.
Epic
Founded in a basement in 1979, Epic develops software to help people get well, help people stay well, and help future generations be healthier.
- Data Security
- Patient Care
- Ease of Use
- Easy Access
- Workflow Efficiency
- Comprehensive Features