Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management | Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.4 | 4.3 |
| Review count | 34 | 217 |
| Ease of use | 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Ease of setup | 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Quality of support | 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Meets requirements | 8.7 | 8.8 |
| NPS | 55.882353 | 53.5 |
| Small Business | 41.2% | 6.9% |
| Mid-Market | 23.5% | 16.6% |
| Enterprise | 35.3% | 76.5% |
| Total page views | 188 | 305 |
| Total LLM citations | 974 | 1,009 |
Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management
Defender Vulnerability Management delivers asset visibility, intelligent assessments, and built-in remediation tools for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS, and network devices. Leveraging Microsoft threat intelligence, breach likelihood predictions, business contexts, and devices assessments, Defender Vulnerability Management rapidly and continuously prioritizes the biggest vulnerabilities on your most critical assets and provides security recommendations to mitigate risk. Reduce risk with continuous vulnerability assessment, risk-based prioritization, and remediation.
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), the original SaaS risk-based vulnerability management platform, prioritizes vulnerabilities that pose a real risk, enabling Security and IT teams to focus their limited resources and remediate more efficiently. Cisco’s data science-driven prioritization evaluates both enterprise data and a wealth of data on real-world exploit activity and translates that context into actionable intelligence to guide remediation.