G2 Vendor Directory

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management vs. Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricMicrosoft Defender Vulnerability Management

by Microsoft

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

by Cisco

Overall rating4.44.3
Review count34217
Ease of use8.98.7
Ease of setup8.48.6
Quality of support8.98.9
Meets requirements8.78.8
NPS55.88235353.5
Small Business41.2%6.9%
Mid-Market23.5%16.6%
Enterprise35.3%76.5%
Total page views188305
Total LLM citations9741,009

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management

Defender Vulnerability Management delivers asset visibility, intelligent assessments, and built-in remediation tools for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS, and network devices. Leveraging Microsoft threat intelligence, breach likelihood predictions, business contexts, and devices assessments, Defender Vulnerability Management rapidly and continuously prioritizes the biggest vulnerabilities on your most critical assets and provides security recommendations to mitigate risk. Reduce risk with continuous vulnerability assessment, risk-based prioritization, and remediation.

Pros

    Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

    Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), the original SaaS risk-based vulnerability management platform, prioritizes vulnerabilities that pose a real risk, enabling Security and IT teams to focus their limited resources and remediate more efficiently. Cisco’s data science-driven prioritization evaluates both enterprise data and a wealth of data on real-world exploit activity and translates that context into actionable intelligence to guide remediation.

    Pros