Mend vs. Relatient
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Mend | Relatient |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.7 | 4.8 |
| Review count | 135 | 27 |
| Ease of use | 9.5 | 9.6 |
| Ease of setup | 9.2 | 9.3 |
| Quality of support | 9.6 | 9.3 |
| Meets requirements | 9.7 | 9.6 |
| NPS | 83.809524 | 92.307692 |
| Small Business | 52.6% | 51.9% |
| Mid-Market | 31.1% | 40.7% |
| Enterprise | 16.3% | 7.4% |
| Total page views | 11,843 | 201 |
| Total LLM citations | 2,532 | 711 |
Mend
Patients rarely use portals, and EHRs were not designed to support the full patient journey. Mend solves both challenges by giving outpatient mental and behavioral healthcare organizations a fully integrated patient engagement platform that makes it easier for people to enter care, stay connected, and follow through with treatment. Mend is used by CCBHCs, Community Mental Health organizations, Substance Use and Alcohol Use treatment programs, group practices, and many other outpatient behavioral health providers with 25 or more caregivers.
- Communication
- Telehealth Services
- Product Satisfaction
- Appointment Scheduling
- Communication Efficiency
- Patient Communication
Relatient
At Relatient, we believe that the key to better health is better access. Better access lies at the intersection of scheduling and communication. Our Dash® platform combines best in KLAS patient self-scheduling and centralized scheduling with modern two-way patient communication tools to provide better access for patients, better utilization for providers, and better outcomes for all. For more information or to schedule a demo, visit www.relatient.com.