G2 Vendor Directory

Mend vs. Klara

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricMend

by Mendfamily

Klara

by Klara

Overall rating4.74.6
Review count135112
Ease of use9.59.3
Ease of setup9.29.4
Quality of support9.69.1
Meets requirements9.79.3
NPS83.80952471.428571
Small Business52.6%73.6%
Mid-Market31.1%20.9%
Enterprise16.3%5.5%
Total page views11,843965
Total LLM citations2,5327,829

Mend

Patients rarely use portals, and EHRs were not designed to support the full patient journey. Mend solves both challenges by giving outpatient mental and behavioral healthcare organizations a fully integrated patient engagement platform that makes it easier for people to enter care, stay connected, and follow through with treatment. Mend is used by CCBHCs, Community Mental Health organizations, Substance Use and Alcohol Use treatment programs, group practices, and many other outpatient behavioral health providers with 25 or more caregivers.

Pros

  • Communication
  • Telehealth Services
  • Product Satisfaction
  • Appointment Scheduling
  • Communication Efficiency
  • Patient Communication

Klara

Constant phone calls lead to long wait times, fragmented communication, endless phone tag, unhappy patients, and staff burnout. With Klara, medical practices are able to improve their operational efficiency and centralize patient communication channels with a true system of engagement, integrated with the leading EHRs, and used throughout the entire practice. Every touchpoint throughout the patient journey can be automated with Klara, from appointment reminders to post-visit instructions and beyond.

Pros

  • Communication
  • Ease of Use
  • Patient Communication
  • Texting Communication
  • User Interface
  • Messaging Management