Kilter vs. Liongard
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Kilter | Liongard |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| Review count | 202 | 59 |
| Ease of use | 9.4 | 8.7 |
| Ease of setup | 9.0 | 8.1 |
| Quality of support | 9.5 | 9.3 |
| Meets requirements | 9.5 | 9.1 |
| NPS | 77 | 76.271186 |
| Small Business | 32.7% | 64.4% |
| Mid-Market | 28.1% | 35.6% |
| Enterprise | 39.3% | 0.0% |
| Total page views | 653 | 296 |
| Total LLM citations | 0 | 1,046 |
Kilter
More than 500 enterprises worldwide trust Kilter by BackBox as their network cyber resilience platform. Kilter includes support for network devices from over 180 vendors, thousands of pre-built automations, and a no-code way to create new ones. Kilter empowers teams with the confidence to automate critical network processes, maintain business continuity during disruptions, and recover swiftly. From backups and OS updates to configuration compliance and vulnerability management, Kilter ensures that automations deliver consistent, reliable outcomes.
- Automation
- Ease of Use
- Backup
- Time-saving
- Features
- Backup Management
Liongard
Liongard delivers the system of authority for modern IT operations by creating a trusted layer of asset intelligence across the entire technology stack. The platform continuously discovers and analyzes assets, configurations, and identities, providing the reliable data foundation needed to power automation, strengthen cybersecurity, and enable AI-driven operations. IT teams and managed service providers rely on Liongard to reduce operational friction, improve visibility, and build resilient, scalable environments.
- Features
- Team Collaboration
- Reliability
- Integrations
- Customer Support
- Customization Options