KernelCare Enterprise vs. Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | KernelCare Enterprise | Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Review count | 21 | 217 |
| Ease of use | 9.2 | 8.7 |
| Ease of setup | 9.5 | 8.6 |
| Quality of support | 9.5 | 8.9 |
| Meets requirements | 9.3 | 8.8 |
| NPS | 71.428571 | 53.5 |
| Small Business | 25.0% | 6.9% |
| Mid-Market | 10.0% | 16.6% |
| Enterprise | 65.0% | 76.5% |
| Total page views | 193 | 305 |
| Total LLM citations | 754 | 1,009 |
KernelCare Enterprise
TuxCare’s live patching solution, KernelCare Enterprise, enables organizations to automate Linux vulnerability patching without needing to restart systems or experience downtime to apply patches – allowing them to accelerate patch timelines while eliminating patching-related maintenance windows. While other live patching solutions are typically limited to a single Linux distribution and come with a heftier price tag, KernelCare Enterprise delivers patches to all popular Linux distributions.
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), the original SaaS risk-based vulnerability management platform, prioritizes vulnerabilities that pose a real risk, enabling Security and IT teams to focus their limited resources and remediate more efficiently. Cisco’s data science-driven prioritization evaluates both enterprise data and a wealth of data on real-world exploit activity and translates that context into actionable intelligence to guide remediation.