Jane vs. Minerva
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Jane | Minerva |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| Review count | 19 | 14 |
| Ease of use | 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Ease of setup | 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Quality of support | 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Meets requirements | 8.0 | 8.1 |
| NPS | 52.941176 | 0 |
| Small Business | 89.5% | 57.1% |
| Mid-Market | 5.3% | 21.4% |
| Enterprise | 5.3% | 21.4% |
| Total page views | 383 | 35 |
| Total LLM citations | 6,126 | 42 |
Jane
Cloud-based booking platform which helps clinics with workflow management, practitioner management, scheduling, billing, patient record keeping, and documentation.
- Ease of Use
- Customer Support
- Patient Communication
- User Interface
- Intuitive Use
- Patient Care
Minerva
MphRx’s Minerva is an enterprise-level SMART on FHIR digital healthcare platform, engineered to aggregate data from disparate IT systems to build a unified longitudinal patient health record. Minerva’s capabilities are configurable to deliver scalable digital transformation through dedicated cloud deployments. The platform is deployed in over 20 countries and manages over three-hundred million patient records. Minerva has enabled large health systems to aggregate healthcare data and orchestrate workflows across complex and diverse technology environments using a unique vendor-neutral approach.