Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) vs. TRAFFIC SHIELD
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) | TRAFFIC SHIELD |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.7 | 4.2 |
| Review count | 41 | 23 |
| Ease of use | 9.4 | 9.4 |
| Ease of setup | 9.2 | 9.4 |
| Quality of support | 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Meets requirements | 9.6 | 9.5 |
| NPS | 87.179487 | 47.826087 |
| Small Business | 39.0% | 100.0% |
| Mid-Market | 19.5% | 0.0% |
| Enterprise | 41.5% | 0.0% |
| Total page views | 464 | 339 |
| Total LLM citations | 4,607 | 260 |
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
As organizations increasingly rely on web applications to drive business, ensuring those applications are protected from cyber threats is essential. Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) delivers robust, enterprise-class protection for applications and APIs across cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments. With near-zero false positives and managed rules created and tested by Imperva Threat Research, more than 90% of customers deploy in blocking mode from day one.
- Protection
- Cybersecurity
- WAF (Web Application Firewall)
- Security
- Real-time Monitoring
- Customer Support
TRAFFIC SHIELD
Trafficshield uses the best sources for updating its database. We keep a close watch on the latest proxies/IP's We update our database from worldwide most trusted sources.
- Ease of Use
- Integrations
- Implementation Ease
- Reliability
- Protection
- Features