Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) vs. DataDome
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) | DataDome |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.7 | 4.7 |
| Review count | 41 | 244 |
| Ease of use | 9.4 | 9.3 |
| Ease of setup | 9.2 | 8.9 |
| Quality of support | 9.1 | 9.6 |
| Meets requirements | 9.6 | 9.4 |
| NPS | 87.179487 | 83.539095 |
| Small Business | 39.0% | 16.0% |
| Mid-Market | 19.5% | 54.3% |
| Enterprise | 41.5% | 29.6% |
| Total page views | 464 | 1,400 |
| Total LLM citations | 4,607 | 17,198 |
Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)
As organizations increasingly rely on web applications to drive business, ensuring those applications are protected from cyber threats is essential. Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) delivers robust, enterprise-class protection for applications and APIs across cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments. With near-zero false positives and managed rules created and tested by Imperva Threat Research, more than 90% of customers deploy in blocking mode from day one.
- Protection
- Cybersecurity
- WAF (Web Application Firewall)
- Security
- Real-time Monitoring
- Customer Support
DataDome
DataDome delivers real-time bot and agent trust management, providing complete visibility and control over all traffic—whether human, bot, or AI. Named a Leader in The Forrester Wave™ for Bot And Agent Trust Management Q2 2026, DataDome is trusted by enterprises like Etsy, PayPal, and Soundcloud. Acting as a traffic-control plane, DataDome's multi-layered AI engine leverages thousands of models and 5 trillion signals daily to analyze intent and stop fraud in under 2 milliseconds, allowing legitimate users to pass through seamlessly across websites, apps, APIs, and MCPs.
- Protection
- Customer Support
- Efficiency
- Dashboard Usability
- Easy Integrations
- Ease of Use