G2 Vendor Directory

Imperva Advanced Bot Protection vs. Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricImperva Advanced Bot Protection

by Thales Group

Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)

by Thales Group

Overall rating4.14.7
Review count1241
Ease of use8.99.4
Ease of setup8.99.2
Quality of support9.19.1
Meets requirements9.69.6
NPS18.18181887.179487
Small Business16.7%39.0%
Mid-Market41.7%19.5%
Enterprise41.7%41.5%
Total page views281464
Total LLM citations3,2614,607

Imperva Advanced Bot Protection

Automated bot attacks have become a major security concern for businesses across industries. From credential stuffing to web scraping and fraud, malicious bots target websites, APIs, and mobile applications, posing significant risks to data, customer trust, and revenue. As automation now dominates how digital services are accessed, and AI increases the scale and sophistication of these threats, organizations face growing challenges in distinguishing between legitimate and malicious activity.

Pros

    Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)

    As organizations increasingly rely on web applications to drive business, ensuring those applications are protected from cyber threats is essential. Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) delivers robust, enterprise-class protection for applications and APIs across cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments. With near-zero false positives and managed rules created and tested by Imperva Threat Research, more than 90% of customers deploy in blocking mode from day one.

    Pros

    • Protection
    • Cybersecurity
    • WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    • Security
    • Real-time Monitoring
    • Customer Support