IBM QRadar EDR vs. Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | IBM QRadar EDR | Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.2 | 4.3 |
| Review count | 47 | 217 |
| Ease of use | 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Ease of setup | 7.7 | 8.6 |
| Quality of support | 8.4 | 8.9 |
| Meets requirements | 9.1 | 8.8 |
| NPS | 44.444444 | 53.5 |
| Small Business | 44.7% | 6.9% |
| Mid-Market | 40.4% | 16.6% |
| Enterprise | 14.9% | 76.5% |
| Total page views | 57 | 305 |
| Total LLM citations | 4 | 1,009 |
IBM QRadar EDR
IBM Security QRadar EDR (formerly ReaQta) combines automation and dashboards to minimize analyst workloads, detect anomalous endpoint behavior and remediate threats in near real time. IBM Security QRadar EDR is available on AWS Marketplace. With visibility across endpoints, it combines expected features, like MITRE ATT&CK mapping and attack visualizations, with dual-engine AI and automation. For teams that need extended support, managed detection and response (MDR) services offers 24/7 monitoring and response to help keep users protected.
- Threat Detection
- Ease of Use
- Cybersecurity
- Detection Efficiency
- Protection
- Monitoring
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), the original SaaS risk-based vulnerability management platform, prioritizes vulnerabilities that pose a real risk, enabling Security and IT teams to focus their limited resources and remediate more efficiently. Cisco’s data science-driven prioritization evaluates both enterprise data and a wealth of data on real-world exploit activity and translates that context into actionable intelligence to guide remediation.