Filtered vs. Codility
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Filtered | Codility |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.9 | 4.6 |
| Review count | 16 | 906 |
| Ease of use | 9.2 | 9.2 |
| Ease of setup | 10.0 | 9.3 |
| Quality of support | 10.0 | 9.2 |
| Meets requirements | 9.6 | 9.1 |
| NPS | 93.75 | 76.219512 |
| Small Business | 33.3% | 32.0% |
| Mid-Market | 40.0% | 28.6% |
| Enterprise | 26.7% | 39.4% |
| Total page views | 28 | 1,202 |
| Total LLM citations | 38 | 11,058 |
Filtered
Filtered’s modern approach to hiring technical talent increases your efficiency and effectiveness. With Filtered, companies can automate and streamline the hiring process with customized and automatically-graded job simulations so that only qualified candidates are advanced to interview rounds. The end result is a process that yields better candidates for hiring managers and gives applicants clearer insight into the actual tech stack they’ll be working with on a daily basis.
Codility
Codility is a technical and AI skills assessment platform built on documented assessment science. For almost two decades it has helped engineering and talent teams answer one question with evidence: who can actually do the work. Every task is designed by occupational psychologists, mapped to the Codility Engineering Skills Model, and monitored for adverse impact at every measured cut score. When a result is challenged, the methodology behind it is documented and reviewable. Three products run on that foundation. Screen delivers standardized early technical signal at scale.
- Ease of Use
- Coding Skills
- Assessments
- User Interface
- Candidate Management
- Interviewing Process