Fellow vs. Aster
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Fellow | Aster |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.7 | 4.9 |
| Review count | 2,441 | 13 |
| Ease of use | 9.1 | 8.9 |
| Ease of setup | 9.2 | 7.9 |
| Quality of support | 9.4 | 9.9 |
| Meets requirements | 9.1 | 9.4 |
| NPS | 81.028807 | 92.307692 |
| Small Business | 33.3% | 46.2% |
| Mid-Market | 38.6% | 23.1% |
| Enterprise | 28.0% | 30.8% |
| Total page views | 2,617 | 94 |
| Total LLM citations | 22,223 | 217 |
Fellow
Fellow is the only AI meeting assistant built from the ground up with privacy and security at its core. With both bot and botless recording options, Fellow gives teams full control over how meetings are captured — whether through a visible meeting bot or seamless, native recording with no bot required. Every recording, transcript, and summary is protected by enterprise-grade privacy and access controls, ensuring only the right people see the right information.
- Ease of Use
- Meeting Notes
- Note-taking
- Action Items
- Organization
- Integrations
Aster
Aster addresses the objectives of governance, collective performance and hybrid collaboration by focusing on rituals. It is a collaborative software for taking, structuring and visualizing notes for effective strategic meetings and a better follow-up of actions and decisions. As a Microsoft partner, it is fully integrated into the Teams meeting interface. Aster intervenes in the 3 stages of a ritual. It automates the preparation and maximizes collaboration, makes the animation fluid and rhythmic and automates the sending of the minutes and the follow-up of actions and decisions.