ExtremeDB vs. Cassandra
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | ExtremeDB | Cassandra |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.2 | 4.1 |
| Review count | 10 | 35 |
| Ease of use | 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Ease of setup | 8.6 | 8.5 |
| Quality of support | 8.7 | 7.9 |
| Meets requirements | 9.5 | 8.6 |
| NPS | 50 | 33.333333 |
| Small Business | 20.0% | 17.1% |
| Mid-Market | 50.0% | 34.3% |
| Enterprise | 30.0% | 48.6% |
| Total page views | 23 | 79 |
| Total LLM citations | 2 | 136 |
ExtremeDB
The eXtremeDB database combines exceptional performance, reliability and developer efficiency in a proven real-time embedded database engine.
Cassandra
Cassandra's data model offers the convenience of column indexes with the performance of log-structured updates, strong support for denormalization and materialized views, and powerful built-in caching.