G2 Vendor Directory

Embold vs. OpenText Static Application Security Testing

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricEmbold

by Embold Technologies

OpenText Static Application Security Testing

by OpenText

Overall rating4.74.5
Review count1824
Ease of use9.58.9
Ease of setup9.48.6
Quality of support9.58.9
Meets requirements9.08.6
NPS86.66666761.904762
Small Business55.6%29.2%
Mid-Market27.8%25.0%
Enterprise16.7%45.8%
Total page views200369
Total LLM citations2851,393

Embold

Embold supports developers and development teams by finding critical code issues before they become roadblocks. It is the perfect tool to analyze, diagnose, transform, and sustain your software efficiently. With the use of A.I. and machine learning technologies, Embold can immediately prioritize issues, suggest ways to best solve them, and re-factor software where necessary. Run it within your current Dev-Ops stack, on premise or in the cloud privately or publicly.

Pros

    OpenText Static Application Security Testing

    OpenText™ Static Application Security Testing (SAST) is a comprehensive solution designed to identify and remediate security vulnerabilities within an application's source code during the early stages of development. By analyzing code from the "inside out," SAST provides immediate feedback to developers, enabling them to address security issues promptly and effectively. Key Features and Functionality: - Extensive Language Support: Supports over 33 programming languages and more than 1,400 vulnerability categories, ensuring broad applicability across various development environments.

    Pros

    • Integration Support
    • Integrations
    • Easy Integrations