G2 Vendor Directory

Docusign CLM vs. Gatekeeper

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricDocusign CLM

by Docusign

Gatekeeper

by Gatekeeper

Overall rating4.34.5
Review count50396
Ease of use8.99.2
Ease of setup8.58.4
Quality of support8.89.5
Meets requirements9.09.0
NPS55.98377367.058824
Small Business27.1%22.9%
Mid-Market45.7%49.0%
Enterprise27.1%28.1%
Total page views2,301960
Total LLM citations18,96012,588

Docusign CLM

While eSignature has changed the way that many organizations execute a contract, the lifecycle before and after signature is often managed through manual processes, spreadsheets, and emails—slowing the pace of doing business, increasing risk, and frustrating customers and employees. Docusign CLM (Contract Lifecycle Management) allows organizations to streamline the agreement lifecycle by transforming analog manual processes into a digital automated workflow. The end result is an accelerated pace of doing business, increased compliance, and more efficient employees.

Pros

  • Ease of Use
  • Digital Signing
  • Digital Signatures
  • Document Management
  • Simple
  • Efficiency

Gatekeeper

Vendors. Contracts. Unified. Gatekeeper is one system of truth for vendors and contracts. Built for lean Finance, Procurement and Legal teams with enterprise-sized compliance responsibilities, Gatekeeper puts every vendor, contract, obligation, renewal, performance review and line of spend on one unified record. Unlike standalone CLM, supplier risk and procurement tools, every stage of your vendor lifecycle stays whole: vendor onboarding and contracting in one workflow, on one unified record.

Pros

  • Ease of Use
  • Customer Support
  • Implementation Ease
  • Contract Management
  • Customization
  • Intuitive