Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs. SecureFlag
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) | SecureFlag |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3 | 4.8 |
| Review count | 217 | 43 |
| Ease of use | 8.7 | 9.3 |
| Ease of setup | 8.6 | 9.3 |
| Quality of support | 8.9 | 9.8 |
| Meets requirements | 8.8 | 9.3 |
| NPS | 53.5 | 93.023256 |
| Small Business | 6.9% | 25.6% |
| Mid-Market | 16.6% | 46.5% |
| Enterprise | 76.5% | 27.9% |
| Total page views | 305 | 399 |
| Total LLM citations | 1,009 | 1,479 |
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), the original SaaS risk-based vulnerability management platform, prioritizes vulnerabilities that pose a real risk, enabling Security and IT teams to focus their limited resources and remediate more efficiently. Cisco’s data science-driven prioritization evaluates both enterprise data and a wealth of data on real-world exploit activity and translates that context into actionable intelligence to guide remediation.
SecureFlag
SecureFlag is a Developer Security Enablement Platform designed to assist organizations in mitigating application risk throughout the software development lifecycle (SDLC). By integrating automated threat modeling with practical secure coding training, SecureFlag addresses critical vulnerabilities that arise from insecure design decisions and inadequate secure coding skills among development teams.