G2 Vendor Directory

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs. Palo Alto Cortex XSIAM

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricCisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

by Cisco

Palo Alto Cortex XSIAM

by Palo Alto Networks

Overall rating4.34.4
Review count217120
Ease of use8.78.8
Ease of setup8.68.7
Quality of support8.98.7
Meets requirements8.89.1
NPS53.560.747664
Small Business6.9%26.1%
Mid-Market16.6%35.3%
Enterprise76.5%38.7%
Total page views3051,082
Total LLM citations1,0098,326

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), the original SaaS risk-based vulnerability management platform, prioritizes vulnerabilities that pose a real risk, enabling Security and IT teams to focus their limited resources and remediate more efficiently. Cisco’s data science-driven prioritization evaluates both enterprise data and a wealth of data on real-world exploit activity and translates that context into actionable intelligence to guide remediation.

Pros

    Palo Alto Cortex XSIAM

    Product Description: Palo Alto Networks' Cortex XSIAM is an AI-driven security operations platform designed to transform traditional Security Operations Centers by integrating and automating key functions such as data centralization, threat detection, and incident response. By leveraging machine learning and automation, it enables organizations to detect and respond to threats more efficiently, reducing manual workloads and improving overall security posture.

    Pros

    • Ease of Use
    • Threat Detection
    • Features
    • Monitoring
    • Integrations
    • Cybersecurity