G2 Vendor Directory

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs. Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricCisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

by Cisco

Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management

by Microsoft

Overall rating4.34.4
Review count21734
Ease of use8.78.9
Ease of setup8.68.4
Quality of support8.98.9
Meets requirements8.88.7
NPS53.555.882353
Small Business6.9%41.2%
Mid-Market16.6%23.5%
Enterprise76.5%35.3%
Total page views305188
Total LLM citations1,009974

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), the original SaaS risk-based vulnerability management platform, prioritizes vulnerabilities that pose a real risk, enabling Security and IT teams to focus their limited resources and remediate more efficiently. Cisco’s data science-driven prioritization evaluates both enterprise data and a wealth of data on real-world exploit activity and translates that context into actionable intelligence to guide remediation.

Pros

    Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management

    Defender Vulnerability Management delivers asset visibility, intelligent assessments, and built-in remediation tools for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS, and network devices. Leveraging Microsoft threat intelligence, breach likelihood predictions, business contexts, and devices assessments, Defender Vulnerability Management rapidly and continuously prioritizes the biggest vulnerabilities on your most critical assets and provides security recommendations to mitigate risk. Reduce risk with continuous vulnerability assessment, risk-based prioritization, and remediation.

    Pros