Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs. KernelCare Enterprise
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) | KernelCare Enterprise |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3 | 4.6 |
| Review count | 217 | 21 |
| Ease of use | 8.7 | 9.2 |
| Ease of setup | 8.6 | 9.5 |
| Quality of support | 8.9 | 9.5 |
| Meets requirements | 8.8 | 9.3 |
| NPS | 53.5 | 71.428571 |
| Small Business | 6.9% | 25.0% |
| Mid-Market | 16.6% | 10.0% |
| Enterprise | 76.5% | 65.0% |
| Total page views | 305 | 193 |
| Total LLM citations | 1,009 | 754 |
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), the original SaaS risk-based vulnerability management platform, prioritizes vulnerabilities that pose a real risk, enabling Security and IT teams to focus their limited resources and remediate more efficiently. Cisco’s data science-driven prioritization evaluates both enterprise data and a wealth of data on real-world exploit activity and translates that context into actionable intelligence to guide remediation.
KernelCare Enterprise
TuxCare’s live patching solution, KernelCare Enterprise, enables organizations to automate Linux vulnerability patching without needing to restart systems or experience downtime to apply patches – allowing them to accelerate patch timelines while eliminating patching-related maintenance windows. While other live patching solutions are typically limited to a single Linux distribution and come with a heftier price tag, KernelCare Enterprise delivers patches to all popular Linux distributions.