G2 Vendor Directory

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs. IBM QRadar EDR

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricCisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

by Cisco

IBM QRadar EDR

by IBM

Overall rating4.34.2
Review count21747
Ease of use8.78.7
Ease of setup8.67.7
Quality of support8.98.4
Meets requirements8.89.1
NPS53.544.444444
Small Business6.9%44.7%
Mid-Market16.6%40.4%
Enterprise76.5%14.9%
Total page views30557
Total LLM citations1,0094

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), the original SaaS risk-based vulnerability management platform, prioritizes vulnerabilities that pose a real risk, enabling Security and IT teams to focus their limited resources and remediate more efficiently. Cisco’s data science-driven prioritization evaluates both enterprise data and a wealth of data on real-world exploit activity and translates that context into actionable intelligence to guide remediation.

Pros

    IBM QRadar EDR

    IBM Security QRadar EDR (formerly ReaQta) combines automation and dashboards to minimize analyst workloads, detect anomalous endpoint behavior and remediate threats in near real time. IBM Security QRadar EDR is available on AWS Marketplace. With visibility across endpoints, it combines expected features, like MITRE ATT&CK mapping and attack visualizations, with dual-engine AI and automation. For teams that need extended support, managed detection and response (MDR) services offers 24/7 monitoring and response to help keep users protected.

    Pros

    • Threat Detection
    • Ease of Use
    • Cybersecurity
    • Detection Efficiency
    • Protection
    • Monitoring