G2 Vendor Directory

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs. Cortex Cloud

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricCisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

by Cisco

Cortex Cloud

by Palo Alto Networks

Overall rating4.34.1
Review count217129
Ease of use8.78.1
Ease of setup8.68.1
Quality of support8.98.3
Meets requirements8.88.6
NPS53.536.507937
Small Business6.9%30.2%
Mid-Market16.6%31.8%
Enterprise76.5%38.0%
Total page views305861
Total LLM citations1,0094,651

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)

Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), the original SaaS risk-based vulnerability management platform, prioritizes vulnerabilities that pose a real risk, enabling Security and IT teams to focus their limited resources and remediate more efficiently. Cisco’s data science-driven prioritization evaluates both enterprise data and a wealth of data on real-world exploit activity and translates that context into actionable intelligence to guide remediation.

Pros

    Cortex Cloud

    Cortex Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, the next version of Prisma Cloud, understands a unified security approach is essential for effectively addressing AppSec, CloudSec, and SecOps. Connecting cloud security and SOC workflows enables teams to achieve holistic visibility, trace risk across the lifecycle, and correlate real-time threat activity with development and runtime contexts. Cortex Cloud is a unified platform built on three core pillars: data integration, AI-driven intelligence, and automation.

    Pros

    • Ease of Use
    • Features
    • Security
    • Visibility
    • Cloud Integration
    • Cloud Services