Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) vs. Bugcrowd
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM) | Bugcrowd |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.3 | 4.3 |
| Review count | 217 | 61 |
| Ease of use | 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Ease of setup | 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Quality of support | 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Meets requirements | 8.8 | 8.8 |
| NPS | 53.5 | 51.666667 |
| Small Business | 6.9% | 35.1% |
| Mid-Market | 16.6% | 28.1% |
| Enterprise | 76.5% | 36.8% |
| Total page views | 305 | 1,050 |
| Total LLM citations | 1,009 | 9,423 |
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM)
Cisco Vulnerability Management (formerly Kenna.VM), the original SaaS risk-based vulnerability management platform, prioritizes vulnerabilities that pose a real risk, enabling Security and IT teams to focus their limited resources and remediate more efficiently. Cisco’s data science-driven prioritization evaluates both enterprise data and a wealth of data on real-world exploit activity and translates that context into actionable intelligence to guide remediation.
Bugcrowd
Bugcrowd frees organizations with a low tolerance for risk from chronic talent shortages, noisy tools that breed false positives, and the fear of critical hidden or emerging vulnerabilities. Our SaaS platform provides access to the unlimited capacity and skills of the global ethical hacker/pentester community for deeper, proactive risk reduction and faster regulatory compliance. With 12+ years of experience and 1200+ customers in every industry (including OpenAI, National Australia Bank, Indeed, USAA, Twilio, and CISA), we know what long-term with crowdsourced security looks like.
- Reporting Quality
- Ease of Use
- Customer Support
- Vulnerability Detection
- Communication
- Features