Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) vs. Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS) | Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.1 | 4.5 |
| Review count | 17 | 171 |
| Ease of use | 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Ease of setup | 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Quality of support | 7.6 | 8.5 |
| Meets requirements | 8.6 | 9.1 |
| NPS | 53.846154 | 65.868263 |
| Small Business | 11.8% | 18.3% |
| Mid-Market | 23.5% | 45.0% |
| Enterprise | 64.7% | 36.7% |
| Total page views | 157 | 864 |
| Total LLM citations | 98 | 7,427 |
Cisco Secure IPS (NGIPS)
High performance. Resiliency. Security operations empowerment. NGIPS receives new policy rules and signatures every two hours, so your security is always up to date.
Palo Alto Networks Next-Generation Firewalls
Our next-generation firewall classifies all traffic, including encrypted traffic, based on application, application function, user and content. You can create comprehensive, precise security policies, resulting in safe enablement of applications. This lets only authorized users run sanctioned applications, greatly reducing the surgace area of cyber attacks across the organization.
- Ease of Use
- Features
- Threat Protection
- Firewall Efficiency
- Protection
- Threat Detection