G2 Vendor Directory

Azure Web Application Firewall vs. Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricAzure Web Application Firewall

by Microsoft

Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)

by Thales Group

Overall rating4.44.7
Review count3141
Ease of use8.59.4
Ease of setup9.09.2
Quality of support8.59.1
Meets requirements9.49.6
NPS58.06451687.179487
Small Business23.3%39.0%
Mid-Market40.0%19.5%
Enterprise36.7%41.5%
Total page views184464
Total LLM citations3304,607

Azure Web Application Firewall

Azure Web Application Firewall is a cloud-native security service designed to protect web applications and APIs from common web vulnerabilities and attacks, such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting. By integrating seamlessly with Azure services like Application Gateway, Front Door, and Content Delivery Network , Azure WAF offers centralized protection, ensuring the security and availability of web applications without the need for modifications to backend code.

Pros

    Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)

    As organizations increasingly rely on web applications to drive business, ensuring those applications are protected from cyber threats is essential. Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) delivers robust, enterprise-class protection for applications and APIs across cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments. With near-zero false positives and managed rules created and tested by Imperva Threat Research, more than 90% of customers deploy in blocking mode from day one.

    Pros

    • Protection
    • Cybersecurity
    • WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    • Security
    • Real-time Monitoring
    • Customer Support