G2 Vendor Directory

AWS WAF vs. Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricAWS WAF

by Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)

by Thales Group

Overall rating4.34.7
Review count7241
Ease of use8.59.4
Ease of setup8.49.2
Quality of support8.99.1
Meets requirements9.19.6
NPS50.76923187.179487
Small Business33.3%39.0%
Mid-Market33.3%19.5%
Enterprise33.3%41.5%
Total page views208464
Total LLM citations1,0234,607

AWS WAF

AWS WAF (Web Application Firewall) is a security service designed to protect web applications and APIs from common web exploits and bots that can compromise security, affect availability, or consume excessive resources. By enabling users to define customizable web security rules, AWS WAF allows precise control over which traffic to allow or block, ensuring robust protection tailored to specific application needs.

Pros

  • WAF (Web Application Firewall)
  • Solutions
  • Cloud Integration
  • Custom Rules
  • DDoS Protection
  • Protection

Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)

As organizations increasingly rely on web applications to drive business, ensuring those applications are protected from cyber threats is essential. Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) delivers robust, enterprise-class protection for applications and APIs across cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments. With near-zero false positives and managed rules created and tested by Imperva Threat Research, more than 90% of customers deploy in blocking mode from day one.

Pros

  • Protection
  • Cybersecurity
  • WAF (Web Application Firewall)
  • Security
  • Real-time Monitoring
  • Customer Support