Amp vs. GitHub Copilot
A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.
| Metric | Amp | GitHub Copilot |
|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Review count | 92 | 400 |
| Ease of use | 8.8 | 9.3 |
| Ease of setup | 9.0 | 9.3 |
| Quality of support | 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Meets requirements | 8.6 | 8.8 |
| NPS | 65.934066 | 66.237113 |
| Small Business | 68.5% | 37.1% |
| Mid-Market | 20.7% | 32.7% |
| Enterprise | 10.9% | 30.1% |
| Total page views | 506 | 3,107 |
| Total LLM citations | 9,246 | 32,690 |
Amp
Sourcegraph’s AI code assistant goes beyond individual dev productivity, helping enterprises achieve consistency and quality at scale with AI. Sourcegraph accelerates the entire workflow for developers by providing them a more natural and intuitive way to work. Searching code, chatting with AI, invoking prompts, and using agents can now all be performed in one place with the best models available.
- Ease of Use
- Coding Assistance
- User Experience
- Easy Integrations
- Features
- Time-saving
GitHub Copilot
GitHub Copilot helps more than 1 million developers and over 20,000 businesses push what’s possible in software development. Based on powerful LLMs, including OpenAI’s GPT models, this AI pair programmer helps developers write code faster and with less work by drawing context from comments and code to suggest individual lines and whole functions instantly. All languages are supported, however the more common a language, the better represented it will be in the training data and the more robust suggestions will be.
- Ease of Use
- Coding Assistance
- Productivity Improvement
- Problem Solving
- Efficiency
- Time-saving