G2 Vendor Directory

ALVAO Asset Management vs. Kilter

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricALVAO Asset Management

by ALVAO

Kilter

by BackBox

Overall rating4.74.5
Review count48202
Ease of use8.99.4
Ease of setup8.89.0
Quality of support9.69.5
Meets requirements9.39.5
NPS87.577
Small Business6.3%32.7%
Mid-Market64.6%28.1%
Enterprise29.2%39.3%
Total page views72653
Total LLM citations490

ALVAO Asset Management

ALVAO IT Asset Management (ITAM) gives organizations full lifecycle visibility and control of IT hardware and software, cutting down manual work with an intuitive tree-structured interface. With real‑time discovery via network monitoring systems, Agent, SNMP, Intune, and SCCM integration, it simplifies audits, optimizes licenses (including Microsoft 365), and supports compliance with Cyber Essentials, NIST, NIS2, and DORA. A visual CMDB maps dependencies for faster incident resolution and change planning, helping IT teams stay efficient, compliant, and cost-effective.

Pros

  • User Interface
  • Ease of Use
  • Asset Management
  • Automation
  • Customizability
  • Product Quality

Kilter

More than 500 enterprises worldwide trust Kilter by BackBox as their network cyber resilience platform. Kilter includes support for network devices from over 180 vendors, thousands of pre-built automations, and a no-code way to create new ones. Kilter empowers teams with the confidence to automate critical network processes, maintain business continuity during disruptions, and recover swiftly. From backups and OS updates to configuration compliance and vulnerability management, Kilter ensures that automations deliver consistent, reliable outcomes.

Pros

  • Automation
  • Ease of Use
  • Backup
  • Time-saving
  • Features
  • Backup Management