G2 Vendor Directory

Akamai Bot Manager vs. Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)

A side-by-side comparison based on G2 review data.

MetricAkamai Bot Manager

by Akamai Technologies

Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)

by Thales Group

Overall rating4.54.7
Review count1041
Ease of use9.09.4
Ease of setup9.19.2
Quality of support9.19.1
Meets requirements9.39.6
NPS6087.179487
Small Business20.0%39.0%
Mid-Market20.0%19.5%
Enterprise60.0%41.5%
Total page views191464
Total LLM citations3,1384,607

Akamai Bot Manager

Bot Manager relies on the simple premise that bots are not all created equal. Many bots play a legitimate role in your online business strategy. Others harm your business by reducing competitive advantage, getting between you and your customers, or committing fraud. Bot Manager provides a flexible framework to manage bot traffic based on the needs of your business—to better engage with your customers, improve your security posture, and control the traffic coming to your website every day.

Pros

    Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF)

    As organizations increasingly rely on web applications to drive business, ensuring those applications are protected from cyber threats is essential. Imperva Web Application Firewall (WAF) delivers robust, enterprise-class protection for applications and APIs across cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments. With near-zero false positives and managed rules created and tested by Imperva Threat Research, more than 90% of customers deploy in blocking mode from day one.

    Pros

    • Protection
    • Cybersecurity
    • WAF (Web Application Firewall)
    • Security
    • Real-time Monitoring
    • Customer Support