Watermark Student Learning & Licensure
28
Reviews
4.1
Star rating
#46
Rank in Assessment
Pros and cons
Pros
- Assessments
- Reporting
- Features
- Efficiency
- Ease of Use
- Platform Integration
Cons
- Learning Curve
- Quiz Issues
- Assessment Issues
- Lack of Customization
- Difficulty
- Technical Issues
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Key stats
—
36
Mid-Market
1
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 25.0% |
| Mid-Market | 42.9% |
| Enterprise | 32.1% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q1 | 10 | 3.9 |
| 2025 Q2 | 18 | 4.2 |
Satisfaction ratings
Ease of Use8.1
Ease of Setup7.8
Quality of Support8.5
Meets Requirements8.3
What reviewers say
Using Watermark SLL for three years now.
4.0
“Report running is relatively easy, and tracking students across different semesters and placements is easy and useful.”
Review of the Watermark Student Learning & Licensure
4.0
“Easy access, help organizing and keeping track of student work, support building e-portfolio, help with program accreditation”
Scales well and has robust features
4.5
“Watermark works great for scalability and improving student learning in online courses. It particularly has been great for us with regard to eportfolios and peer assessment; two things very hard to do at scale! It also integrates with Canvas LMS which is huge!”