W3C alternatives
Vendors whose G2 category profile most closely matches W3C’s, weighted by where each one’s reviews actually sit.
| Vendor | Rating | Reviews | Growth (QoQ) | Categories | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 Froala Bucharest, Romania | 4.3 | 188 | — | 1 | Compare |
 Vev Oslo | 4.4 | 170 | — | 8 | Compare |
 Automattic Inc. San Francisco, CA | 4.4 | 4,371 | -80.0% | 19 | Compare |
 Tiny Technologies, Inc. Palo Alto, CA | 4.5 | 119 | -100.0% | 1 | Compare |
 Wix Tel Aviv | 4.2 | 1,972 | -81.6% | 9 | Compare |
 Duda Palo Alto, CA | 4.6 | 793 | -50.0% | 5 | Compare |
 CKSource Warszawa, Woj. Mazowieckie | 4.3 | 66 | — | 1 | Compare |
 Summernote N/A | 4.7 | 39 | — | 1 | Compare |
 Webflow San Francisco, California | 4.4 | 995 | -84.2% | 9 | Compare |
 Elementor Ramat Gan, Tel Aviv District, Israel | 4.4 | 464 | -76.2% | 7 | Compare |