Next.js
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in JavaScript Web Frameworks
Pros and cons
Pros
- Routing
- Ease of Use
- Components
- Speed
- Simple
- Middleware Support
Cons
- Time-Consuming
- Difficult Setup
- Learning Curve
- Integration Issues
- Error Handling
- Update Issues
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Winning from
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 93.8% |
| Mid-Market | 6.3% |
| Enterprise | 0.0% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Q4 | 3 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q1 | 1 | 5.0 |
| 2025 Q3 | 2 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q4 | 4 | 4.8 |
| 2026 Q1 | 3 | 4.3 |
| 2026 Q2 | 2 | 4.8 |
| 2026 Q3 | 1 | — |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Fast, Scalable Full-Stack Apps with Next.js
“Next.js makes it straightforward to build fast, scalable full-stack web applications. I especially appreciate its file-based routing, server-side rendering, and API routes, along with its seamless integration with React. Together, these features help speed up development while al”
Powerful Rendering Options and App Router That Scale from Landing Pages to SaaS
“- SSR, SSG, ISR, and client-side rendering - App Router and server components - Great scalablity for landing pages to large SaaS platforms”
Next.js Makes Full-Stack Serverless Development Effortless
“I could do everything from backend to frontend with nextjs and go serverless”