ThreatConnect TI Ops
Reviews
Star rating
Rank in Threat Intelligence
Pros and cons
Pros
- Threat Detection
- Features
- Ease of Use
- Implementation Ease
- Automation
- Integrations
Cons
- UX Improvement
- API Limitations
- Difficult Learning Curve
- Difficult Setup
- Software Bugs
- Additional Costs
Traffic & LLM citations
Source: G2 review data
Losing to
Key stats
Adoption by company size
| Segment | Share of reviews |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 14.3% |
| Mid-Market | 28.6% |
| Enterprise | 57.1% |
Quarterly history
| Quarter | Reviews | Star rating |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Q1 | 4 | 4.8 |
| 2025 Q2 | 3 | 4.7 |
| 2025 Q3 | 2 | 4.5 |
Satisfaction ratings
What reviewers say
Powerful Threat Intelligence Platform with Excellent Automation and Customization
“The no-code, drag-and-drop Playbook builder is excellent. We've automated things like enrichment (VirusTotal, DomainTools), sandbox submissions, and even screenshot capture of suspicious URLs. It's flexible and integrates well with other tools.”
One size fits all solution.
“TC promotes cross-collaboration like any other TI solution due to the sheer amount of people involved in enriching and reporting indicators of compromise and the absolute vast amount of OSINT we get from it. This allows for accurate and efficient decision making when mitigation a”
I love using Threat Connect its really easy to handle
“Our one of the client uses Threat connect for threat intellicence to block and protect the user playbooks is the best part.”